Cameron Slams AI Actors ๐
James Cameron is lowkey freaking out about AI replacing actors, no cap
So, James Cameron just gave an interview and Iโm dead
The Tea โ
They really said โhold my coffeeโ and expressed how โhorrifyingโ it is to think about Gen AI replacing actors (yes, really). I mean, the man is on the board of Stability AI, so youโd think heโd be all about that AI life, but I guess not when it comes to stealing actorsโ jobs.
Heโs all about using AI in filmmaking, but only if itโs to make human creation more โsacredโ (okay, James, thatโs deep). The people who actually know things are saying this tech will raise the bar for human-made art, and honestly, thatโs a bit of a flex.
Why This Matters (Or Doesnโt) ๐
This is lowkey a whole thing and Iโm not okay - the idea that AI could replace actors is wild, but also, letโs be real, itโs giving me โrent freeโ vibes. Like, can AI really replace the charm of a human actor?
Iโm skeptical, but also, Iโve seen some crazy AI-generated content, so maybe Iโm just delulu.
On the other hand, if AI can make human creation more โsacredโ, then Iโm all for it (no cap). Itโs like, the more tech we have, the more weโll appreciate the real thing, right?
The Vibe Check ๐
All in all, James Cameron is out here looking like the main character, trying to protect the actorsโ jobs, and Iโm living for it. The vibe Iโm getting is that AI is about to change the game, but not in a way thatโs going to make human actors obsolete (fr fr).
Itโs going to be a wild ride, but hey, at least weโll have some good content out of it, and thatโs all that matters, right?
So, whatโs the tea, folks? Are you team AI or team human?
Originally reported by Deadline
Got a question about this? ๐ค
Ask anything about this article and get an instant answer.
Answers are AI-generated based on the article content.
vibe check: