Judge Delays Minnesota ICE Decision While Weighing Whethe...

What’s Happening

Not gonna lie, A federal judge ordered a new briefing due Wednesday on whether DHS is using armed raids to pressure Minnesota into abandoning its sanctuary policies, leaving ICE operations in place for now.

Dell Cameron Security Jan 26, 2026 5:39 PM Judge Delays Minnesota ICE Decision While Weighing Whether State Is Being Illegally Punished A federal judge ordered a new briefing due Wednesday on whether DHS is using armed raids to pressure Minnesota into abandoning its sanctuary policies, leaving ICE operations in place for now. Photograph: Ben Brewer/ Save Story Save this story Save Story Save this story A federal judge on Monday declined to ASAP curb the federal operation that has put armed agents on the streets of Minneapolis and St. (we’re not making this up)

Paul , but ordered the government to file a new briefing answering a central claim in the case : that the surge is being used to punish Minnesota and force state and local authorities to change their laws and cooperate with the targeting of local immigrants.

The Details

The order leaves the operation’s scope and tactics in place for now, but requires the federal government to explain whether it is using armed raids and street arrests to pressure Minnesota into detaining immigrants and handing over sensitive state data. In a written order , Judge Kate Menendez directed the federal government to directly address whether Operation Metro Surge was designed to “punish Plaintiffs for adopting sanctuary laws and policies.

” The court ordered the Department of Homeland Security to respond to allegations that the surge was a tool to coerce the state to change laws, public assistance data and other state records, divert local resources to assist immigration arrests, and hold people in custody “for longer periods of time than otherwise allowed. ” The judge dropped the additional briefing was required because the coercion claim became clearer only after recent developments, including public statements officials made after Minnesota sought emergency relief.

Why This Matters

A key factor in the court’s analysis is a January 24 letter from US attorney general Pam Bondi to Minnesota governor Tim Walz, which Minnesota described as an “extortion.

Tech companies have been making moves like this as competition heats up.

The Bottom Line

This story is still developing, and we’ll keep you updated as more info drops.

Is this a W or an L? You decide.